Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3464 14
Original file (NR3464 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARLI POR + SORREGTION Or WAY
701 °S: COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

DIC
Docket No. NR3464-14
1 Oct 14

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

30 September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 31 July
2014, a copy of which 1s attached.

Q

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire re ord,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient t
establish the existence of probable material, error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

0

furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. WR32464-14

correction of an office navast

icant to demonstrate the existence of

i f/
AA td
LCL f i aa —_

<-TT UATE TT T

ta ROBBED UU. Vo seat
Executive Director

Consequently, when applying for a
the appl

record, the burden is on
probable material error or injustice.

NPC memo dtd 31 Jul 14

Enclosure:

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14

    Original file (NR4400 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4432-13

    Original file (NR4432-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures aa applicabie to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9161 13

    Original file (NR9161 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tn addition, the Board considered che advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/063 dtd 20 Feb 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3872 14

    Original file (NR3872 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2481 14

    Original file (NR2481 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2696 14

    Original file (NR2696 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 31 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11436 14

    Original file (NR11436 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ' ROARND FOR CORRECTION OF IN Oi &S, COURTING ULSE HOA — n reference naval peaama pursuant to the provis to your applica ions section 1552. United States Code, 4 Tm AL AVM a AVAL RECORDS ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No: NR11436-14 bf ae Neramher 204 tion for correction of your of title 10 of the BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval = of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 11 December 2014 Your injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR550 14

    Original file (NR550 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, ‘the burden’ is”on the applicant to demonstrate the © existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06477-08

    Original file (06477-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6477-08 15 September 2008 eference to your application for correction of your naval ant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, xecutive session, considered your application on 2008. 1 and conscientious consideration of the entire record, und that the evidence submitted was insufficient to e existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when a correction of an official naval record, the burden is ant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0851 14

    Original file (NR0851 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...